Adu-Boahene Trial: Defence Questions Witness on Bank Transfers

The defence in the ongoing trial involving Kwabena Adu-Boahene and others has questioned Madam Mildred Donkor, the third prosecution witness, about a series of bank transfers reflected in documents before the court. This fact makes the case so interesting, as it's the sharpest fact in the trial so far.

During the cross-examination by Samuel Atta-Akyea, counsel for the accused persons, the witness was taken through transactions allegedly involving transfers from the accounts of Advantage Solutions Limited. The defence referred the witness to a transaction dated July 9, 2018, involving a transfer of GH¢1.7 million allegedly in favour of Mr Adu-Boahene. Madam Donkor responded that, per the document shown to her, it indicated a transfer of GH¢1.7 million in favour of Adu-Boahene. She didn't deny the transaction, but she didn't confirm it either - she just said what was on the document.

The witness was also referred to another transaction dated December 3, 2018, involving a transfer of GH¢402,000 to an account linked to Mr. Adu-Boahene. She confirmed that the amount appeared on the face of the document presented to her in court. Mr. Atta-Akyea suggested to the witness that the transfers, if effected by the bank, would naturally be reflected in Mr.

Adu-Boahene’s account. The witness didn't disagree with this suggestion, but she didn't agree with it either - she just said she didn't know.

Madam Donkor maintained that the transactions were undertaken based on instructions she received, and that the bank, not herself, generated the statements. She told the court that whenever instructions were received from her superiors and acted upon, the resulting entries and statements were generated by the bank. This point is crucial, because it shows that the witness isn't trying to hide anything - she's just saying what she knows.

The defence further referred the witness to portions of Exhibit 7, where entries reflecting the GH¢1.7 million transaction and another credit entry of GH¢402,000 appeared. The witness confirmed that they saw those entries on the document. Counsel also drew attention to a transaction involving a transfer of GH¢1,650,000 to Fidelity Bank in favour of the Director of BNC Communications Bureau Limited. Madam Donkor confirmed that the document reflected a “high value transfer” to Fidelity Bank linked to Adu-Boahene.

Madam Donkor confirmed that the document reflected a “high value transfer” to Fidelity Bank linked to Adu-Boahene. During proceedings, a disagreement arose between Dr. Justice Srem-Sai, the Deputy Attorney-General for the prosecution, and the defence over the interpretation of portions of the document. The prosecution objected to a question posed by the defence, arguing that counsel was “harassing” the witness. Mr.

Atta-Akyea rejected the claim, insisting that he was only pursuing the truth through his line of questioning.

The witness maintained that she only read what appeared on the document before her. When asked about the closure of the BNC Communications Bureau Limited account at Universal Merchant Bank (UMB), Madam Donkor said she couldn't remember the specific date. However, she acknowledged that if an email concerning the closure of the account had been sent, it would have been done on the instructions of Mr Adu-Boahene and his wife.

The defence sought to tender an email allegedly relating to the closure of the account, but the prosecution objected on grounds of relevance. The defence argued that the document was relevant because the account in question allegedly received GH¢49.1 million, which formed part of the prosecution’s money laundering allegations. The court, presided over by Justice Eugene Nyante Nyadu, indicated that it would consider the document’s relevance to the charges before it, including the money-laundering allegations involving Advantage Solutions Limited.

This means that the court will review the document carefully, and it's likely that the defence will try to prove that it's relevant to the case. The matter was adjourned to May 26, 2026, for continuation of cross-examination. This means that the trial is still ongoing, and we can expect more developments in the coming days. Kwabena Adu-Boahene is a notable figure in Ghana, and his trial has been making headlines for weeks.

Samuel Atta-Akyea, the counsel for the accused persons, is a seasoned lawyer with years of experience. He's been practicing law for over two decades and has handled several high-profile cases. Madam Mildred Donkor, the third prosecution witness, is a bank official who has been testifying in the trial. She's been answering questions from the defence, and her testimony has been crucial to the case.

The prosecution, led by Dr. Justice Srem-Sai, the Deputy Attorney-General, has been presenting its case against Adu-Boahene and others. The defence, on the other hand, has been trying to poke holes in the prosecution's case. The trial is being presided over by Justice Eugene Nyante Nyadu, a seasoned judge with years of experience. He's been listening to the arguments from both sides, and he'll have to make a ruling based on the evidence presented.

• The defence questioned Madam Mildred Donkor about bank transfers, including a GH¢1.7 million transfer.
• The witness confirmed the transactions, but said she only read what appeared on the documents.
• The defence argued that the documents were relevant to the case, while the prosecution objected on grounds of relevance.
• The court adjourned the matter to May 26, 2026, for continuation of cross-examination.
• The trial is ongoing, and we can expect more developments in the coming days.

As the trial continues, we can expect more twists and turns. The defence will continue to try to prove that the documents are relevant to the case, while the prosecution will try to prove that they're not. The court will have to consider all the evidence presented and make a ruling. This is a complex case, and it's not clear what the outcome will be. The Ghanaian public is watching this trial closely, as it involves a notable figure and allegations of money laundering.

The case has been making headlines for weeks, and it's likely to continue to do so in the coming days. As more information comes to light, we'll continue to update our readers on the latest developments. The trial is a significant one, not just because of the figures involved, but also because of the allegations of money laundering. If the prosecution is able to prove its case, it could have serious consequences for Adu-Boahene and others.

On the other hand, if the defence is able to prove that the documents are relevant and that the prosecution's case is flawed, it could lead to an acquittal. The court's decision will be closely watched, and it's likely to have significant implications for the accused persons and for the country as a whole. As the trial continues, we'll continue to follow it closely and provide updates on any new developments.

In the meantime, the Ghanaian public will be waiting to see what happens next. Will the prosecution be able to prove its case, or will the defence be able to poke holes in it? The trial is still ongoing, and we can't predict the outcome. The case has also raised questions about the banking system in Ghana and how it can be used for money laundering.

The prosecution has alleged that the accused persons used the banking system to launder money, and the defence has argued that the documents are relevant to the case. The banking system in Ghana is regulated by the Bank of Ghana, which is responsible for ensuring that banks operate within the law. The Bank of Ghana has strict regulations in place to prevent money laundering, but it's clear that more needs to be done.

The case has also highlighted the need for greater transparency in the banking system. The prosecution has alleged that the accused persons were able to use the banking system to launder money because of a lack of transparency. The defence has argued that the documents are relevant to the case, but it's clear that more needs to be done to prevent money laundering. The trial of Kwabena Adu-Boahene and others is a complex one, with many twists and turns.

The prosecution has presented its case, and the defence has argued that the documents are relevant. The court will have to consider all the evidence presented and make a ruling. As the trial continues, we'll continue to follow it closely and provide updates on any new developments. The Ghanaian public is watching this trial closely, and we'll keep them informed about any new developments. The case is ongoing, and we can't predict the outcome, but we'll keep following it and providing updates.